1

Upgrade Warnings / Re: Grub claims it can't find /etc/os-release

« Last post by seasons on Today at 01:49:29 »

Which is your old line?

Code: [Select]

GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR=`( . /etc/os-release; echo ${NAME:-Debian} ) 2>/dev/null || echo Debian`
The new line was what I copied when apt prompted me to keep the old version or install the new one (because I increased the timeout).

With
# ls -l /etc/os-release
you can recognize whether it is a file or a link, or a broken link.

Yes, /etc/os-release is a valid file (link to /usr/lib/os-release, which is also a valid file).

Just checked and my file is different from yours. Not sure why?

I don't know why either, but I just changed it to:

Code: [Select]

GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR="Debian"Good enough for me. It seems like this was what the old command was effectively doing anyway since the /etc/os-release thing was failing.

Thanks to all who responded.

2

Hardware - Support / Re: Sporadischer Crash/Reboot

« Last post by devil on Yesterday at 20:45:11 »

Bei mir war über die Jahre in zwei Fällen das Netzteil schuld, obwohl ich nur hochwertige Netzteile einsetze. Ich würde das testen. Auch wenn es das nicht ist, schadet es nicht, eins im Schrank zu haben.

3

Upgrade Warnings / Re: Grub claims it can't find /etc/os-release

« Last post by scholle1 on Yesterday at 20:41:53 »

Hi @seasons.
Your query is unclear.
Which is your old line?
The commented-out line contains the better function.

With
# ls -l /etc/os-ralease
you can recognize whether it is a file or a link, or a broken link.

For both lines with “GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR”, grub terminates with an error message if /etc/os-ralease is not found. Only the error message differs.
Therefore: Check the files or the link. (/etc/os-ralease and /usr/lib/os-release)

4

Upgrade Warnings / Re: Grub claims it can't find /etc/os-release

« Last post by eriefisher on Yesterday at 20:40:50 »

Just checked and my file is different from yours. Not sure why?

Code: [Select]

GRUB_DEFAULT=0
GRUB_TIMEOUT=5
GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR=`lsb_release -i -s 2> /dev/null || echo Debian`
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet resume=UUID=6b753de0-cd23-44f9-96d7-8b69f53a09ff systemd.show_status=1"
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX=""
What do you get when you run:

Code: [Select]

. /etc/os-release && echo ${NAME}

5

Upgrade Warnings / Re: Grub claims it can't find /etc/os-release

« Last post by dibl on Yesterday at 19:11:54 »

Three siduction systems updated so far today -- no problems with any packages including grub.

6

Hardware - Support / Re: Sporadischer Crash/Reboot

« Last post by hendrikL on Yesterday at 18:12:11 »

Hardware Probleme kannst du nur mit Austausch und testen herausfinden.
Bzw, lass das gesamte Testprogramm, smart .... laufen, Stress die Hardware.
Bei Hardware würde ich auf den Ram tippen, vielleicht gibt es ja die Möglichkeit irgendwo Riegel zu bekommen.

Für kritische Anwendungen empfiehlt sich ext4 vor btrfs.
Es kann auch daran liegen, das btrfs ist schon brauchbar, aber noch nicht ganz ausgereift.

Und was ich gerne. auch andere, sehen würde ist die Ausgabe von 'apt policy'.

Ja, es kann auch an Software liegen.

Mach auf jeden Fall ein Backup, wenn eine Festplatte (Speichereinheit?) sich langsam verabschiedet könnte es eng werden.

Mit smart Testen und Stressen.
Wie man ein Netzteil testet weiß ich leider nicht.

7

Hardware - Support / Re: Nvidia 570 Treiber

« Last post by towo on Yesterday at 15:17:15 »

Es existiert weder 570 noch 575 im Debian Salsa, somit wird es auch keine solchen Pakete für siduction geben.
Wer diese neueren Treiber benötigt, muss sich das Nvidia Cuda Repo enbinden, dort gibt es 570 und 575 verfügbar.

8

Hardware - Support / Re: Nvidia 570 Treiber

« Last post by devil on Yesterday at 14:31:04 »

Ihr dürft nicht vergessen, Debian ist im hard freeze, da kommt bis zur Veröffentlichung von Trixie nichts Neues mehr rein. Und wir haben nicht die Manpower, zusätzliche Pakete außerhalb von Sid zu pflegen, und bestimmt nicht den Nvidia-Treiber. Da könnt ihr jetzt nur hoffen, dass Trixie schnell veröffentlicht wird. Aber ein, zwei Monate dauert es bestimmt noch.

9

Software - Support / Re: Nvidia and Virtualbox Driver patches for upcoming Linux kernel 6.15

« Last post by Teriarch on Yesterday at 13:49:59 »

And here we go: Replace 550.163.01-0 everywhere by 550.163.01-1
in the Nvidia instructions from above.

nvidia-kernel-dkms_550.163.01-1_amd64.deb.patch:

Code: [Select]

diff --new-file -r -U 0 a/DEBIAN/control b/DEBIAN/control
--- a/DEBIAN/control    2025-06-11 22:29:12.000000000 +0200
+++ b/DEBIAN/control    2025-06-12 13:05:29.417510458 +0200
@@ -3 +3 @@
-Version: 550.163.01-1
+Version: 550.163.01-1b
diff --new-file -r -U 0 a/DEBIAN/md5sums b/DEBIAN/md5sums
--- a/DEBIAN/md5sums    2025-06-11 22:29:12.000000000 +0200
+++ b/DEBIAN/md5sums    2025-06-12 13:05:30.040513370 +0200
@@ -92 +92 @@
-4f387da65098825ec53013d00a9464b6  usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia-drm/nvidia-drm-gem-user-memory.c
+696fa58109b3c0b14c8e16d20781e451  usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia-drm/nvidia-drm-gem-user-memory.c
@@ -94 +94 @@
-b51a0b595dbfb85c8e125835ba443442  usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia-drm/nvidia-drm-gem.c
+ffcb9ccb9a5fcdddbe11468987376dab  usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia-drm/nvidia-drm-gem.c
@@ -163 +163 @@
-48e8ed5462ec79cd3e56da2a6f8d312c  usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia-uvm/uvm.c
+48c1f992525474b380bddc6b05b8bcdb  usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia-uvm/uvm.c
@@ -403 +403 @@
-33325cc8972f6767365237c0b0cf9f51  usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia/nv-mmap.c
+4c6d97108146d67ff2c6fd2e5b8d9261  usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia/nv-mmap.c
diff --new-file -r -U 0 a/usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia/nv-mmap.c b/usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia/nv-mmap.c
--- a/usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia/nv-mmap.c        2025-04-08 15:05:18.000000000 +0200
+++ b/usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia/nv-mmap.c        2025-06-12 13:05:08.046411738 +0200
@@ -25,0 +26,2 @@
+#include <linux/version.h>
+
@@ -28,0 +31,5 @@
+
+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(6, 15, 0)
+#define nv_vm_flags_set(v, f) vm_flags_reset((v), (v)->vm_flags | (f))
+#define nv_vm_flags_clear(v, f) vm_flags_reset((v), (v)->vm_flags & ~(f))
+#endif
diff --new-file -r -U 0 a/usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia-drm/nvidia-drm-gem.c b/usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia-drm/nvidia-drm-gem.c
--- a/usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia-drm/nvidia-drm-gem.c     2025-04-08 14:08:07.000000000 +0200
+++ b/usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia-drm/nvidia-drm-gem.c     2025-06-12 13:05:08.048655817 +0200
@@ -53,0 +54,7 @@
+#include <linux/version.h>
+
+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(6, 15, 0)
+#define nv_vm_flags_set(v, f) vm_flags_reset((v), (v)->vm_flags | (f))
+#define nv_vm_flags_clear(v, f) vm_flags_reset((v), (v)->vm_flags & ~(f))
+#endif
+
diff --new-file -r -U 0 a/usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia-drm/nvidia-drm-gem-user-memory.c b/usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia-drm/nvidia-drm-gem-user-memory.c
--- a/usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia-drm/nvidia-drm-gem-user-memory.c 2025-04-08 14:08:07.000000000 +0200
+++ b/usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia-drm/nvidia-drm-gem-user-memory.c 2025-06-12 13:05:08.049535860 +0200
@@ -42,0 +43,7 @@
+#include <linux/version.h>
+
+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(6, 15, 0)
+#define nv_vm_flags_set(v, f) vm_flags_reset((v), (v)->vm_flags | (f))
+#define nv_vm_flags_clear(v, f) vm_flags_reset((v), (v)->vm_flags & ~(f))
+#endif
+
diff --new-file -r -U 0 a/usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia-uvm/uvm.c b/usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia-uvm/uvm.c
--- a/usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia-uvm/uvm.c        2025-04-08 15:05:04.000000000 +0200
+++ b/usr/src/nvidia-current-550.163.01/nvidia-uvm/uvm.c        2025-06-12 13:05:08.050778014 +0200
@@ -23,0 +24,2 @@
+#include <linux/version.h>
+
@@ -41,0 +44,5 @@
+
+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(6, 15, 0)
+#define nv_vm_flags_set(v, f) vm_flags_reset((v), (v)->vm_flags | (f))
+#define nv_vm_flags_clear(v, f) vm_flags_reset((v), (v)->vm_flags & ~(f))
+#endif


10

Software - Support / Re: Nvidia and Virtualbox Driver patches for upcoming Linux kernel 6.15

« Last post by Teriarch on Yesterday at 12:34:51 »

one down, one to go, nvidia-kernel-dkms_550.163.01-1~siduction.1_amd64.patch under way ...