Siduction Forum > Software - Support
Bug in package sddm/0.18.1-1
samoht:
In the virtual terminal vt1 there is no command prompt, only a blinking
cursor.
Launching vt1 via ALT-CTRL-F1 or ALT-[RIGHT,LEFT] ARROW is also not possible.
Downgrading the package sddm into version 0.18.0-1+b2 avoids this bug.
Also vt5 can not be reached here via ALT-CTRL-F5.
Does this mistake occur to you too?
Im virtuellen Terminal vt1 gibt es keine Eingabeaufforderung, sondern nur einen blinkenden Cursor.
Der Start von vt1 über ALT-CTRL-F1 oder ALT-[RECHTS,LINKS] PFEIL ist ebenfalls nicht möglich.
Ein Downgrade des Pakets sddm auf Version 0.18.0-1+b2 vermeidet diesen Fehler.
Auch vt5 kann hier nicht über ALT-CTRL-F5 erreicht werden.
Tritt dieser Fehler auch bei euch auf?
hendrikL:
--- Code: ---~$ LANG=C apt policy sddm
sddm:
Installed: 0.18.1-1
--- End code ---
All fine here™!
Which theme you are using?
I use the siduction theme (sddm-theme-patience) with some modifications.
samoht:
Ich nutze das breeze theme bzw glaube das
--- Code: ---# LANG=C dpkg -l *sddm* | grep ^ii
ii kde-config-sddm 4:5.17.5-2 amd64 KCM module for SDDM
ii patience-sddm-settings 2018.3.0-1 all SDDM settings (installed mode)
ii sddm 0.18.0-1+b2 amd64 modern display manager for X11
ii sddm-theme-breeze 4:5.17.5-4 amd64 Breeze SDDM theme
ii sddm-theme-patience 2018.3.0-1 all theme for sddm
--- End code ---
Vielleicht ist doch etwas verkonfiguriert?
finotti:
I also don't have VT1, but do have VTs 2 to 6.
I also lost my two monitor configuration for SDDM, but could redo it (following https://blog.victormendonca.com/2018/06/29/how-to-fix-sddm-on-multiple-screens/).
hendrikL:
--- Quote from: finotti on 2020/02/25, 22:51:55 ---I also don't have VT1, but do have VTs 2 to 6.
--- End quote ---
Well, i checked it and I also have only a blinking cursor at vt1/tty1 but i am able to navigate with alt+arrow(right/left) between vt2 - vt6.
I don't think that this is a bug, IIRC in kde-neon (based on ubuntu 18.04 lts or so) the graphical login is on vt1 and not vt7, I am able to check this tomorrow, maybe they changed something, who knows?
edit:
https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/3rdparty/sddm/-/commit/84f024dbc4c62400226c896c3e340ad21cfbc357
I think here is the reason why vt1/tty1 and/or vt7/tty7 is reserved/blocked, or what ever it is called, for sddm and graphical login.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version