Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Author Topic:  [solved] Is "Unknown Multi-Arch type" a problem for d-u? [No.]  (Read 9001 times)

Offline michaa7

  • User
  • Posts: 2.295
On my 32 bit WS I currently have this output after apt (-get) update:
Quote
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
W: Unknown Multi-Arch type 'no' for package 'libcdio-dev'
W: Unknown Multi-Arch type 'no' for package 'libiso9660-dev'
W: Unknown Multi-Arch type 'no' for package 'libudf-dev'
W: Probieren Sie »apt-get update«, um diese Probleme zu korrigieren.
Is this a problem for d-u? I assume it's not but I wanted to point to it and learn what's behind it.
« Last Edit: 2014/08/24, 18:21:25 by musca »
Ok, you can't code, but you still might be able to write a bug report for Debian's sake

Offline piper

  • User
  • Posts: 1.785
  • we are the priests ... of the temples of syrinx
Re: Is "Unknown Multi-Arch type" a problem for d-u?
« Reply #1 on: 2014/08/24, 16:48:36 »
 #759105, Merged with #759107, #759109

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=759105
« Last Edit: 2014/08/24, 16:52:09 by piper »
Free speech isn't just fucking saying what you want to say, it's also hearing what you don't want to fucking hear

I either give too many fucks or no fucks at all, it's like I cannot find a middle ground for a moderate fuck distribution, it's like what the fuck

Offline michaa7

  • User
  • Posts: 2.295
Re: Is "Unknown Multi-Arch type" a problem for d-u?
« Reply #2 on: 2014/08/24, 17:32:02 »
thx
Ok, you can't code, but you still might be able to write a bug report for Debian's sake

Offline musca

  • User
  • Posts: 725
  • sid, fly high!
Re: Is "Unknown Multi-Arch type" a problem for d-u?
« Reply #3 on: 2014/08/24, 18:20:25 »
Hello michaa7,
there are a few packages that cause this warning. Details see  https://bugs.debian.org/759099

As it is not a reason for an upgrade warning i will now mark this thread as solved.

greetings
musca
„Es irrt der Mensch, solang er strebt.“  (Goethe, Faust)

Offline michaa7

  • User
  • Posts: 2.295
As it is not a reason for an upgrade warning i will now mark this thread as solved.

Yes, thanks, I should have done this myself. I wasn't sure about the "severity", that's why I posted here.
Ok, you can't code, but you still might be able to write a bug report for Debian's sake

Offline piper

  • User
  • Posts: 1.785
  • we are the priests ... of the temples of syrinx
Actually the "bug" ( Sun, 24 Aug 2014 10:24:01 UTC), was rated normal for severity,  later on today (Sun, 24 Aug 2014 11:39:22 GMT) the severity rating switched to serious, by the time I am done writing this, there will probably be a fix  :)
Free speech isn't just fucking saying what you want to say, it's also hearing what you don't want to fucking hear

I either give too many fucks or no fucks at all, it's like I cannot find a middle ground for a moderate fuck distribution, it's like what the fuck