Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Author Topic:  new chromium-browser really is broken  (Read 5018 times)

Offline dibl

  • siduction community member
  • Global Moderator
  • User
  • *****
  • Posts: 2.358
    • Land of the Buckeye
new chromium-browser really is broken
« on: 2013/11/06, 14:21:05 »
There is a debconf warning about a grave bug in the newest chromium-browser package.  I can confirm -- it won't even launch on the system that I let it install on.
System76 Oryx Pro, Intel Core i7-11800H, SSD 970 EVO Plus;  Asus ROG STRIX X299-E, Core i7-7740X, Nvidia GTX-1060, dual monitors, SSD 860 EVO


Offline melmarker

  • User
  • Posts: 2.799
    • g-com.eu
Re: new chromium-browser really is broken
« Reply #2 on: 2013/11/06, 21:09:30 »
hmm, chromium and chrome was borked from the beginning :)
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. (Benjamin Franklin, November 11, 1755)
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. (Hanlons razor)

Offline dibl

  • siduction community member
  • Global Moderator
  • User
  • *****
  • Posts: 2.358
    • Land of the Buckeye
Re: new chromium-browser really is broken
« Reply #3 on: 2013/11/06, 21:17:43 »
hmm, chromium and chrome was borked from the beginning :)




Once upon a time, there was a browser named Firefox.  It had something named "npviewer" that I called "cpu chewer", because it would drive my cpu to 100% while I was not looking.  In those days, I learned to use chrome/chromium to avoid burning up my cpu.  Now it is just a habit -- iceweasel actually works fine too and I use it sometimes.   :D
System76 Oryx Pro, Intel Core i7-11800H, SSD 970 EVO Plus;  Asus ROG STRIX X299-E, Core i7-7740X, Nvidia GTX-1060, dual monitors, SSD 860 EVO

Offline melmarker

  • User
  • Posts: 2.799
    • g-com.eu
Re: new chromium-browser really is broken
« Reply #4 on: 2013/11/06, 22:31:04 »
chrome and chromium are fine browsers - except their caching behavior. this make web development and debugging nearly impossible. But for everyday usage booth are ok
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. (Benjamin Franklin, November 11, 1755)
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. (Hanlons razor)

Offline michaa7

  • User
  • Posts: 2.300
Re: new chromium-browser really is broken
« Reply #5 on: 2013/11/06, 23:06:35 »
As you may imagine chromium is not my favourite browser. I feel it is difficult to customize and I hate its patronizing behaviour, for example showing the most visited websites in the startpage without giving the user a chance to put there what he wants.
So Opera is by far the best browser, but now dying (i.e. switching to the Blink rendering engine the Opera UI is heavily changing and loosing its mail integration).
FF/IW is an option (maybe seamonkey, which does not provide such a good mail integration as old Opera does).
my 2 cts
Ok, you can't code, but you still might be able to write a bug report for Debian's sake

Offline dibl

  • siduction community member
  • Global Moderator
  • User
  • *****
  • Posts: 2.358
    • Land of the Buckeye
Re: new chromium-browser really is broken
« Reply #6 on: 2013/11/06, 23:14:54 »
I hate its patronizing behaviour, for example showing the most visited websites in the startpage without giving the user a chance to put there what he wants.


I don't understand this.  I have about 6 or 7 tabs set to open when I open the browser, and I don't see anything about most visited until I open a new tab -- then it shows the 8 most frequently used sites.  Usually I do want one of them, so that is a convenience that I appreciate.
System76 Oryx Pro, Intel Core i7-11800H, SSD 970 EVO Plus;  Asus ROG STRIX X299-E, Core i7-7740X, Nvidia GTX-1060, dual monitors, SSD 860 EVO

Offline devil

  • Administrator
  • User
  • *****
  • Posts: 4.842
Re: new chromium-browser really is broken
« Reply #7 on: 2013/11/07, 14:29:34 »
Same here, I like the feature.


greetz
devil

Offline michaa7

  • User
  • Posts: 2.300
Re: new chromium-browser really is broken
« Reply #8 on: 2013/11/07, 14:57:43 »
Fine.
But it may as well be you embellish a misfunction to autosuggest oneself how allegedly pretty functional this thing is. (Very unsure I made me understand with my not so polished english)

Im deutschen würde ich das "sich etwas schönreden (to sugarcoat sth.)" nennen.


Still, I have chrome installed, together with FF/IW and Opera, as a last resort ...
Ok, you can't code, but you still might be able to write a bug report for Debian's sake

Offline devil

  • Administrator
  • User
  • *****
  • Posts: 4.842
Re: new chromium-browser really is broken
« Reply #9 on: 2013/11/07, 16:27:21 »
Thanks for the analysis :P


greetz
devil

Offline michaa7

  • User
  • Posts: 2.300
Re: new chromium-browser really is broken
« Reply #10 on: 2013/11/07, 16:58:14 »
I wouldn't go that far to call it an analysis, but you're welcome!  8)
Ok, you can't code, but you still might be able to write a bug report for Debian's sake

Offline dibl

  • siduction community member
  • Global Moderator
  • User
  • *****
  • Posts: 2.358
    • Land of the Buckeye
Re: new chromium-browser really is broken
« Reply #11 on: 2013/11/07, 17:15:33 »

But it may as well be you embellish a misfunction to autosuggest oneself how allegedly pretty functional this thing is.


Im deutschen würde ich das "sich etwas schönreden (to sugarcoat sth.)" nennen.



Ha ha ha -- michaa7 you have mistaken me for a person who gets emotional about a piece of software!   ;D
« Last Edit: 2013/11/07, 17:27:35 by dibl »
System76 Oryx Pro, Intel Core i7-11800H, SSD 970 EVO Plus;  Asus ROG STRIX X299-E, Core i7-7740X, Nvidia GTX-1060, dual monitors, SSD 860 EVO

Offline melmarker

  • User
  • Posts: 2.799
    • g-com.eu
Re: new chromium-browser really is broken
« Reply #12 on: 2013/11/07, 17:34:41 »
should be finally solved within the next hours:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728823
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. (Benjamin Franklin, November 11, 1755)
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. (Hanlons razor)

Offline dibl

  • siduction community member
  • Global Moderator
  • User
  • *****
  • Posts: 2.358
    • Land of the Buckeye
Re: new chromium-browser really is broken
« Reply #13 on: 2013/11/07, 19:10:50 »
Will the fix posted by clubex need to be reverted?
System76 Oryx Pro, Intel Core i7-11800H, SSD 970 EVO Plus;  Asus ROG STRIX X299-E, Core i7-7740X, Nvidia GTX-1060, dual monitors, SSD 860 EVO

Offline melmarker

  • User
  • Posts: 2.799
    • g-com.eu
Re: new chromium-browser really is broken
« Reply #14 on: 2013/11/07, 19:18:14 »
Don't know - we will see it - if the update throw errors, we know the reason. Eventually. :P
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. (Benjamin Franklin, November 11, 1755)
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. (Hanlons razor)