Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10
41
All of this mess all because of 32-bit architectures?!  >:(

I'm not a package maintainer, but why couldn't this have been done in phases so that users didn't have to wait so-o-o long to perform a full-upgrade?
42
Memtest errors might mean RAM issues. Try reseating the RAM and reboot. If error recurs then you should look into replacing the faulty RAM. It's possible RAM issues might be the underlying cause of the btrfs errors you posted and perhaps more knowledgeable members will chime in.
43
My only concern for now is the bug #1065626

Quote
serious bugs of libgtk2.0-0t64 (→ 2.24.33-4) <Outstanding>
 b1 - #1065626 - libgtk2.0-0t64 / libgtk2.0-bin dependency problem makes dpkg fail with attempt of removal of libgtk2.0-common
Summary:
 libgtk2.0-0t64(1 bug)
Are you sure you want to install/upgrade the above packages? [Y/n/?/...] ^CInterrupted

Is it safe to upgrade?
44
Fully upgraded my main machine today, been slacking off for a month while all this hoopla calmed down.

Now here's an update scenario with some chest hair!
Code: [Select]
610 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1492 not upgraded.
Need to get 1 447 MB of archives.

apt update -> apt upgrade -> aptitude dist-upgrade (because I didn't like the wild amount of packages apt wanted to remove) then actually more packages unlocked for a normal apt upgrade again, then updated Mesa-git manually and installed latest kernel. One single remaining package lingered (libllvmspirvlib17) and needed a reboot to clear it for upgrade.
Boom, done, no pain.

Left with a solitary package that got orphaned for some reason, I use AMD GPU so I don't care but it was a little amusing to see libdrm-nouveau2:i386 dangling in the wind. :)
45
Hardware - Support / Re: "Filter failed"
« Last post by edlin on 2024/03/21, 21:32:52 »
46
Hardware - Support / Re: "Filter failed"
« Last post by lanig on 2024/03/21, 21:23:28 »
OK, thanks for the advice.
Is there a way to have a newer version of Siduction than the installation media from 09-Sep-2023  ?
47
Ich habe gvfs-backends, libmtp9t64 und libmtp-runtime installiert.
Code: [Select]
apt-cache policy gvfs-backends libmtp9t64 libmtp-runtime
gvfs-backends:
  Installiert:           1.54.0-1
  Installationskandidat: 1.54.0-1
  Versionstabelle:
 *** 1.54.0-1 500
        500 http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
libmtp9t64:
  Installiert:           1.1.21-3.1
  Installationskandidat: 1.1.21-3.1
  Versionstabelle:
 *** 1.1.21-3.1 500
        500 http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
libmtp-runtime:
  Installiert:           1.1.21-3.1
  Installationskandidat: 1.1.21-3.1
  Versionstabelle:
 *** 1.1.21-3.1 500
        500 http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

Code: [Select]
apt full-upgrade
Paketlisten werden gelesen… Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut… Fertig
Statusinformationen werden eingelesen… Fertig
Paketaktualisierung (Upgrade) wird berechnet… Fertig
0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht aktualisiert.
48
Ich habe nach meiner Aktuallisierung jetzt doch ein Problem festgestellt.

Ich bekomme im Thunar keine Netzwerkgeräte /Clients/Server angezeigt. Ich kann das Netzwerk nicht mehr "browsen".
Es fehlt wohl das Paket gvfs-backends.

Dazu muss folgendes installiert werden.

Code: [Select]
sudo apt-get -s  install gvfs-backends                                                                                                                   

Die folgenden zusätzlichen Pakete werden installiert:
  libcdio-cdda2t64 libcdio-paranoia2t64 libmtp-runtime libmtp9t64
Vorgeschlagene Pakete:
  bluez-obexd
Die folgenden Pakete werden ENTFERNT:
  libmtp9
Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden installiert:
  gvfs-backends libcdio-cdda2t64 libcdio-paranoia2t64 libmtp9t64
Die folgenden Pakete werden aktualisiert (Upgrade):
  libmtp-runtime
1 aktualisiert, 4 neu installiert, 1 zu entfernen und 225 nicht aktualisiert.

libmtp9t64 hat aber wohl einen Bug und könnte zurückgehalten werden.

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065625

Code: [Select]
Explanation: Pinned by apt-listbugs at 2024-03-21 19:12:22 +0100
Explanation:   #1065625: libmtp9t64 / libmtp-runtime dependency problem makes dpkg fail with attempt of removal of libmtp-common
Package: libmtp9t64
Pin: version *
Pin-Priority: -30000

Verstehe ich das Richtig, dass durch den Bug libmtp-common durch dpkg nicht entfernt werden kann?
libmtp-common  ist installiert.

dpkg --list |grep libmtp-common                                                                                                                               
ii  libmtp-common                                  1.1.21-3.1                           all          Media Transfer Protocol (MTP) common files

Ist der Fehler unkritisch und ich kann die Installation durchführen oder soll ich das Paket pinnen und warten bis der Fehler behoben wurde?
49
Hardware - Support / Re: "Filter failed"
« Last post by hendrikL on 2024/03/21, 18:23:37 »
If it works as a driverless printer, then there is no need to install extra printing software.
What you can try is to download our latest, in this case kde, testimage, and try to print a testfile. If it's working, then something is broken or miss configured on your system.
50
Hardware - Support / Re: "Filter failed"
« Last post by eriefisher on 2024/03/21, 15:42:59 »
I'm not sure what to add at this point. Possibly a firewall issue but you say the printer is detected automatically so this may not be the case.
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 10