Siduction Forum

Siduction Forum => Upgrade Warnings => Topic started by: vayu on 2015/01/11, 04:35:28

Title: bluez-obexd is being held back. Is that ok?
Post by: vayu on 2015/01/11, 04:35:28

I use bluetooth sometimes but am not dependent on it now.  I'm more concerned about my libraries not having conflicts in later upgrades. Does anyone know about bluez?

Title: Re: bluez-obexd is being held back. Is that ok?
Post by: musca on 2015/01/12, 11:15:46

hello vayu,

i'm not sure if bluez-obexd is still needed. It's not part of the default bluetooth functions. This was the software that is independent as obexd, but this has been integrated into BlueZ from BlueZ 5.0.

The installationcandidate depends on libical1a which recently has replaced libical1.
see this thread du will remove KDE apps (http://forum.siduction.org/index.php?topic=5269.0).

I wonder why your stuff isn't removed. Which command did you use to upgrade your system?

greetings
musca

Title: Re: bluez-obexd is being held back. Is that ok?
Post by: vayu on 2015/01/12, 11:44:23

Quote from: musca on 2015/01/12, 11:15:46

I wonder why your stuff isn't removed. Which command did you use to upgrade your system?

Thanks.  It's the only package held back in a regular du.

Title: Re: bluez-obexd is being held back. Is that ok?
Post by: musca on 2015/01/12, 13:10:42

Code: [Select]

apt-cache policy libical1 libical1a

Title: Re: bluez-obexd is being held back. Is that ok?
Post by: vayu on 2015/01/12, 16:47:15

Code: [Select]

$ apt-cache policy libical1 libical1a
libical1:
  Installed: 1.0-1.2
  Candidate: 1.0-1.2
  Version table:
 *** 1.0-1.2 0
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
libical1a:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 1.0-1.3
  Version table:
     1.0-1.3 0
        500 http://http.debian.net/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages


Title: Re: bluez-obexd is being held back. Is that ok?
Post by: musca on 2015/01/13, 09:03:30

So it's confirmed.

Title: Re: bluez-obexd is being held back. Is that ok?
Post by: vayu on 2015/01/13, 10:51:37

If I try to install libical1a or if I try to remove libical1 it wants to remove 77 KDE packages? Will this just resolve or do I have to do something?

Title: Re: bluez-obexd is being held back. Is that ok?
Post by: der_bud on 2015/01/13, 11:20:38

This got solved here and for others (http://forum.siduction.org/index.php?topic=5269.msg43098#new) with a simple dist-upgrade, which removed libical1, newly installed libical1a and updated the rest. If this does not work for you, please paste the complete output of 'apt-get dist-upgrade' (of course after apt-get update ;) ).

Title: Re: bluez-obexd is being held back. Is that ok?
Post by: spacepenguin on 2015/01/18, 17:00:38

bluez-obexd is not installed on my system, libical1 is. And a d-u does not want to remove it although it doesn't seem to be in any repository. If I would try to install libical1a manually it would remove half of kde, but a d-u does not harm (kde-next is enabled). It's "just" that my system depends on an outdated package which it doesn't seem to know  :o.