Siduction Forum
Siduction Forum => Upgrade Warnings => Topic started by: finotti on 2020/10/28, 15:39:31
-
FYI, I ran into this bug today in two systems: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=973297
-
That one is fixed, but 8)
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=973303
we have a new conflict
-
Hmm... The new update seems to have worked for me.
# apt -f install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following additional packages will be installed:
fonts-noto-core fonts-noto-mono
The following NEW packages will be installed:
fonts-noto-mono
The following packages will be upgraded:
fonts-noto-core
1 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 22 not upgraded.
4 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 10.9 MB of archives.
After this operation, 44.0 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Get:1 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian sid/main amd64 fonts-noto-core all 20201027-2 [10.6 MB]
Get:2 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian sid/main amd64 fonts-noto-mono all 20201027-2 [253 kB]
Fetched 10.9 MB in 3s (3,158 kB/s)
(Reading database ... 1830041 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../fonts-noto-core_20201027-2_all.deb ...
Unpacking fonts-noto-core (20201027-2) over (20201027-1) ...
Preparing to unpack .../fonts-noto-mono_20201027-2_all.deb ...
Unpacking fonts-noto-mono (20201027-2) ...
Setting up fonts-noto-mono (20201027-2) ...
Setting up fonts-noto-core (20201027-2) ...
Setting up fonts-noto-hinted (20201027-1) ...
Setting up fonts-noto (20201027-1) ...
Setting up texlive-fonts-extra-links (2020.20200925-1) ...
Processing triggers for auctex (12.2-1) ...
update-auctex-elisp[54647]: Will scan macros for Emacs flavor emacs (log to /var/lib/auctex/emacs/CompilationLog)
Processing triggers for tex-common (6.15) ...
Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done.
Running mtxrun --generate. This may take some time... done.
Processing triggers for fontconfig (2.13.1-4.2) ...
# apt install fonts-noto fonts-noto-core fonts-noto-hinted texlive-fonts-extra-links
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
fonts-noto-core is already the newest version (20201027-2).
texlive-fonts-extra-links is already the newest version (2020.20200925-1).
Recommended packages:
fonts-noto-cjk fonts-noto-cjk-extra fonts-noto-extra fonts-noto-ui-extra
The following packages will be upgraded:
fonts-noto fonts-noto-hinted
2 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 20 not upgraded.
Need to get 41.3 kB of archives.
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Get:1 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian sid/main amd64 fonts-noto all 20201027-2 [20.8 kB]
Get:2 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian sid/main amd64 fonts-noto-hinted all 20201027-2 [20.6 kB]
Fetched 41.3 kB in 0s (99.7 kB/s)
(Reading database ... 1830052 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../fonts-noto_20201027-2_all.deb ...
Unpacking fonts-noto (20201027-2) over (20201027-1) ...
Preparing to unpack .../fonts-noto-hinted_20201027-2_all.deb ...
Unpacking fonts-noto-hinted (20201027-2) over (20201027-1) ...
Setting up fonts-noto-hinted (20201027-2) ...
Setting up fonts-noto (20201027-2) ...
# apt policy fonts-noto-unhinted
fonts-noto-unhinted:
Installed: 20201027-1
Candidate: 20201027-2
Version table:
20201027-2 500
500 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian sid/main amd64 Packages
500 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian sid/main i386 Packages
*** 20201027-1 100
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
-
I take it back...
# apt dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
fonts-noto-unhinted
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/16.9 MB of archives.
After this operation, 683 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
(Reading database ... 1830050 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../fonts-noto-unhinted_20201027-2_all.deb ...
Unpacking fonts-noto-unhinted (20201027-2) over (20201027-1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/fonts-noto-unhinted_20201027-2_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite '/usr/share/fonts/truetype/noto/NotoMono-Bold.ttf', which is also in package fonts-noto-mono 20201027-2
dpkg-deb: error: paste subprocess was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/fonts-noto-unhinted_20201027-2_all.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Sorry...
-
I had the same error, but after
apt update
apt install -f
apt dist-upgrade
everything is fine, no errors
apt dist-upgrade
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut.
Statusinformationen werden eingelesen.... Fertig
Paketaktualisierung (Upgrade) wird berechnet... Fertig
Die folgenden Pakete wurden automatisch installiert und werden nicht mehr benötigt:
libclassmate-java libhibernate-validator-java
Verwenden Sie »apt autoremove«, um sie zu entfernen.
0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht aktualisiert.
apt policy fonts-noto fonts-noto-core fonts-noto-hinted
fonts-noto:
Installiert: (keine)
Installationskandidat: 20201027-2
Versionstabelle:
20201027-2 500
500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian unstable/main i386 Packages
fonts-noto-core:
Installiert: 20201027-2
Installationskandidat: 20201027-2
Versionstabelle:
*** 20201027-2 500
500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian unstable/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
fonts-noto-hinted:
Installiert: 20201027-2
Installationskandidat: 20201027-2
Versionstabelle:
*** 20201027-2 500
500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages
500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian unstable/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
-
For some reason, it does not work here...
# apt update
[...]Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
1 package can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see it.
# apt -f install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
# apt dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
fonts-noto-unhinted
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/16.9 MB of archives.
After this operation, 683 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
(Reading database ... 1830050 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../fonts-noto-unhinted_20201027-2_all.deb ...
Unpacking fonts-noto-unhinted (20201027-2) over (20201027-1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/fonts-noto-unhinted_20201027-2_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite '/usr/share/fonts/truetype/noto/NotoMono-Bold.ttf', which is also in package fonts-noto-mono 20201027-2
dpkg-deb: error: paste subprocess was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/fonts-noto-unhinted_20201027-2_all.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
root@debian[/home/finotti]# apt -f install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
# apt policy fonts-noto fonts-noto-core fonts-noto-hinted
fonts-noto:
Installed: 20201027-2
Candidate: 20201027-2
Version table:
*** 20201027-2 500
500 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian sid/main amd64 Packages
500 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian sid/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
fonts-noto-core:
Installed: 20201027-2
Candidate: 20201027-2
Version table:
*** 20201027-2 500
500 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian sid/main amd64 Packages
500 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian sid/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
fonts-noto-hinted:
Installed: 20201027-2
Candidate: 20201027-2
Version table:
*** 20201027-2 500
500 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian sid/main amd64 Packages
500 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian sid/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
-
may be https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=973286 (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=973286)
-
may be https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=973286 (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=973286)
That seems right. And indeed, in my system now it seems fixed. "apt update", "apt dist-upgrade", and "apt -f install" seems to have done it now. I will mark solved if no one else say that are still having trouble.
-
Not fixed here:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
fonts-noto-core : Breaks: fonts-noto-unhinted (< 20201027-1~) but 20200323-1 is installed
fonts-noto-extra : Breaks: fonts-noto-unhinted (< 20201027-1~) but 20200323-1 is installed
fonts-noto-ui-extra : Breaks: fonts-noto-unhinted (< 20201027-1~) but 20200323-1 is installed
That bug report you posted lists the bug in fonts-noto-unhinted_20201027-2 for which the package says it has been fixed in 20201027-3 which has not been uploaded to the repo yet.
https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-noto/-/commit/3fd98fb12cfce6a616af3ccbf69bb62cf2b6004b
That was one hour ago so will be uploaded shortly I presume.
-
So, for my system it is fixed.
~$ dpkg -l fonts-noto* | grep ii | awk '{print $1,$2,$3}'
ii fonts-noto 20201027-3
ii fonts-noto-cjk 1:20190410+repack1-2
ii fonts-noto-cjk-extra 1:20190410+repack1-2
ii fonts-noto-color-emoji 0~20200916-1
ii fonts-noto-core 20201027-3
ii fonts-noto-extra 20201027-3
ii fonts-noto-hinted 20201027-3
ii fonts-noto-mono 20201027-3
ii fonts-noto-ui-core 20201027-3
ii fonts-noto-ui-extra 20201027-3
ii fonts-noto-unhinted 20201027-3
-
All good here now too. I had to do apt -f install to get it to complete though.