Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Author Topic: [EN] adding non siduction repository (CLOSED)  (Read 7613 times)

Offline devil

  • Administrator
  • User
  • *****
  • Posts: 4.842
[EN] RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: adding non siduction rep
« Reply #15 on: 2012/01/12, 11:12:39 »
huh?

Offline ralul

  • User
  • Posts: 1.814
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: adding non siduction rep
« Reply #16 on: 2012/01/12, 11:26:23 »
w3you.com
experiencing siduction runs better than my gentoo makes me know I know nothing

Offline devil

  • Administrator
  • User
  • *****
  • Posts: 4.842
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: adding non siduction rep
« Reply #17 on: 2012/01/12, 15:37:41 »
Here is a nice example i came upon in #debian support today:
Code: [Select]
Package files:
 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     release a=now
 700 http://dl.google.com/linux/talkplugin/deb/ stable/main i386 Packages
     release v=1.0,o=Google, Inc.,a=stable,n=stable,l=Google,c=main
     origin dl.google.com
 700 http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable/main i386 Packages
     release v=1.0,o=Google, Inc.,a=stable,n=stable,l=Google,c=main
     origin dl.google.com
 500 http://download.skype.com/linux/repos/debian/ stable/non-free i386 Packages
     origin download.skype.com
   1 http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports/ lenny-backports/non-free i386 Packages
     release o=Debian Backports,a=lenny-backports,n=lenny-backports,l=Debian Backports,c=non-free
     origin backports.debian.org
   1 http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports/ lenny-backports/contrib i386 Packages
     release o=Debian Backports,a=lenny-backports,n=lenny-backports,l=Debian Backports,c=contrib
     origin backports.debian.org
   1 http://backports.debian.org/debian-backports/ lenny-backports/main i386 Packages
     release o=Debian Backports,a=lenny-backports,n=lenny-backports,l=Debian Backports,c=main
     origin backports.debian.org
 650 http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing/non-free i386 Packages
     release o=Debian,a=testing,n=wheezy,l=Debian,c=non-free
     origin ftp.debian.org
 650 http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing/contrib i386 Packages
     release o=Debian,a=testing,n=wheezy,l=Debian,c=contrib
     origin ftp.debian.org
 650 http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing/main i386 Packages
     release o=Debian,a=testing,n=wheezy,l=Debian,c=main
     origin ftp.debian.org
 500 http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-updates/non-free i386 Packages
     release o=Debian,a=stable-updates,n=squeeze-updates,l=Debian,c=non-free
     origin ftp.debian.org
 500 http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-updates/contrib i386 Packages
     release o=Debian,a=stable-updates,n=squeeze-updates,l=Debian,c=contrib
     origin ftp.debian.org
 500 http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-updates/main i386 Packages
     release o=Debian,a=stable-updates,n=squeeze-updates,l=Debian,c=main
     origin ftp.debian.org
 700 http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates/non-free i386 Packages
     release v=6.0,o=Debian,a=stable,n=squeeze,l=Debian-Security,c=non-free
     origin security.debian.org
 700 http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates/contrib i386 Packages
     release v=6.0,o=Debian,a=stable,n=squeeze,l=Debian-Security,c=contrib
     origin security.debian.org
 700 http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates/main i386 Packages
     release v=6.0,o=Debian,a=stable,n=squeeze,l=Debian-Security,c=main
     origin security.debian.org
 700 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/non-free i386 Packages
     release v=6.0.3,o=Debian,a=stable,n=squeeze,l=Debian,c=non-free
     origin ftp.us.debian.org
 700 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/contrib i386 Packages
     release v=6.0.3,o=Debian,a=stable,n=squeeze,l=Debian,c=contrib
     origin ftp.us.debian.org
 700 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main i386 Packages
     release v=6.0.3,o=Debian,a=stable,n=squeeze,l=Debian,c=main
     origin ftp.us.debian.org
Pinned packages:
libc6:
  Installed: 2.11.2-10
  Candidate: 2.11.2-10
  Version table:
     2.13-24 0
        650 http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing/main i386 Packages
 *** 2.11.2-10 0
        700 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main i386 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
dpkg:
  Installed: 1.15.8.11
  Candidate: 1.15.8.11
  Version table:
     1.16.1.2 0
        650 http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing/main i386 Packages
 *** 1.15.8.11 0
        700 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main i386 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
perl:
  Installed: 5.10.1-17squeeze2
  Candidate: 5.10.1-17squeeze2
  Version table:
     5.14.2-6 0
        650 http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing/main i386 Packages
 *** 5.10.1-17squeeze2 0
        700 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main i386 Packages
        700 http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates/main i386 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
vlc:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 1.1.3-1squeeze6
  Version table:
     1.1.13-1 0
        650 http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing/main i386 Packages
     1.1.3-1squeeze6 0
        700 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main i386 Packages
        700 http://security.debian.org/ squeeze/updates/main i386 Packages
libva1:
  Installed: 1.0.14-1
  Candidate: 1.0.14-1
  Version table:
 *** 1.0.14-1 0
        650 http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing/main i386 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     1.0.1-3 0
        700 http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main i386 Packages

No need to tell that it exploded in the users face.
The longer, the better does not apply everywhere.

greetz
devil

hinto

  • Guest
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: adding non siduction rep
« Reply #18 on: 2012/01/12, 16:08:02 »
What devil said.
What brought me to Debian was one-stop shopping.
What brought me to siduction (sid) was apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade.
-H

gunmetalsid

  • Guest
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: adding non siduction
« Reply #19 on: 2012/01/13, 08:25:43 »
Quote from: "devil"
Why not decide by which wallpaper you like better? :)

Honestly, you have a desease, Its dangerous and its called repositoryitis.
afaik it was originaly brought into linux by Ubuntu. On their forum i have seen sources.lists longer than my arm. Poor souls, no cure for that yet.

For a normal desktop, siduction brings all the repos you need. And combining sid with stable is just insane.

greetz
devil


 :lol: Hell I "HATE" Ubuntu. Only becoz Ubuntu is popular the reason I asked these question. Just trying to make some ppl to migrate to siduction. I had no idea it was a crime on siduction.

Like I said I was knoppix die hard fans before I move to Sidux. I hate Ubuntu since the Breezy Badger release. Because you bring it all up, I just wanna say Ubuntu developer and user was full of ignorant fu****** fanboys and elitists. I wanna puked on all their release especially since that damn Unity. So never associated me with that Ubuntu thing.

I move to rpm base because the death of Sidux, come back to sid becoz of Aptosid. Throw me out from this forum if you don't like what I said bout that so called mighty Ubuntu. Thank God Mint is now number one DC, so that stupid, ignorant fu****** fanboys and elitists shut their mouth for a while.

regards,
gunmetalsid  :twisted:

Offline piper

  • User
  • Posts: 1.785
  • we are the priests ... of the temples of syrinx
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: adding non siduc
« Reply #20 on: 2012/01/13, 09:20:04 »
Mint = Ubuntu no matter how you slice it.

Mint does have a version based on Debian.

Linux Mint Debian Edition (LMDE) based on Debian Testing.



From the Faqs at Linux Mint

Quote
FAQ about LMDE
1. Is LMDE compatible with Ubuntu-based Linux Mint editions?

No, it is not. LMDE is compatible with Debian, which isn't compatible with Ubuntu.


I am very glad to see that, many people don't know that fact
Free speech isn't just fucking saying what you want to say, it's also hearing what you don't want to fucking hear

I either give too many fucks or no fucks at all, it's like I cannot find a middle ground for a moderate fuck distribution, it's like what the fuck

gunmetalsid

  • Guest
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: adding non s
« Reply #21 on: 2012/01/13, 11:04:21 »
Quote from: "piper"
Mint = Ubuntu no matter how you slice it.

Mint does have a version based on Debian.

Linux Mint Debian Edition (LMDE) based on Debian Testing.



From the Faqs at Linux Mint

Quote
FAQ about LMDE
1. Is LMDE compatible with Ubuntu-based Linux Mint editions?

No, it is not. LMDE is compatible with Debian, which isn't compatible with Ubuntu.


I am very glad to see that, many people don't know that fact


I know bout that, even crunchbang was base from ubuntu before moving to debian. pclos and mageia was a fork of mandriva. and siduction was fork of aptosid.

even mint was base on ubuntu, did they use that stupid Unity? Nope Clem developed mate, mgse and the latest desktop is cinnamon.

I was using linux fully since 2000, and I know many distro up and down. I'm totally a newbie, and I don't give a damn when ppl said if you know how to code something or even fixing sound and resolution you're not a newbie. I'm a newbie and I'm proud of it.

regards,
gunmetalsid

Offline ralul

  • User
  • Posts: 1.814
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: adding non s
« Reply #22 on: 2012/01/13, 14:18:36 »
@gunmetalsid
I don't hate ubuntu. I even recommend it for newbies sometimes when it seems adequat to me. And nobody gets dumped here. Only if you recommend places where trojans are waiting ...

The question remains: Why do you mention the slam private repo in two threads? This seems really unmotivated to me as there is only one newer umts helper application in the moment.

Though there was a "hating" interaction between us and slam in the past. Not that beautiful ...

The most easy way to not include foreign repos: Ask here for some new application to include.
experiencing siduction runs better than my gentoo makes me know I know nothing

hinto

  • Guest
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: adding n
« Reply #23 on: 2012/01/13, 15:02:09 »
@gunmetalsid It's not a crime on siduction; It's a crime in Debian.  Not that the Linux police will come and get you, but Ubuntu is a fork of Debian.  It starts out with a snapshot of Debian unstable every six months.  They then "fix" their snapshot with testing/backports/forks of the original source, etc.  Then it gets packaged as a release.  It's kinda like making sausage (or chicken nuggets). Is this good or bad?  That is in the eyes of the beholder.  But that is why, in general, Ubuntu repos aren't compatible with Debian.  Case in point: If I download the UltraEdit deb (for Ubuntu) it will not install on m Debian distro.
-Hinto

gunmetalsid

  • Guest
RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: adding n
« Reply #24 on: 2012/01/13, 17:37:46 »
Ubuntu LTS is using Debian Testing as base, while Ubuntu Stable using Debian Unstable????? WTF!!!! How can something Unstable become Stable?????

I'm sorry, it was just me and my big mouth. I should close this thread immediately.

regards,
gunmetalsid