Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: [EN] Liquorix Kernels  (Read 13256 times)

Offline DeepDayze

  • User
  • Posts: 457
[EN] Liquorix Kernels
« on: 2011/12/23, 02:06:03 »
Anyone planning to try damentz's wonderful Liquorix kernels with siduction? In fact maybe he should be invited here :)

I remember the aptosid devs regarded him as a bit wacked but he's indeed a smart fellow...his kernels work quite well
Logged

Offline ralul

  • User
  • Posts: 1.814
Liquorix Kernels
« Reply #1 on: 2011/12/23, 14:54:26 »
/me I would appreciate to have such a skilled discussion partner like damentz here ...
Logged
experiencing siduction runs better than my gentoo makes me know I know nothing

Offline cryptosteve

  • User
  • Posts: 675
Liquorix Kernels
« Reply #2 on: 2011/12/23, 14:58:37 »
You guys are free to invite him ... and why not try alternative kernels with siduction?

But hey, towos siduction kernel is quite cool and works perfectly here ...
Logged
- born to create drama -
CS Virtual Travel Bug: VF6G5D

Offline towo

  • Administrator
  • User
  • *****
  • Posts: 2.938
RE: Liquorix Kernels
« Reply #3 on: 2011/12/23, 15:03:45 »
And the liquorix-kernel can't be included in the iso, since it is not dfsg.
Logged
Ich gehe nicht zum Karneval, ich verleihe nur manchmal mein Gesicht.

Offline ralul

  • User
  • Posts: 1.814
RE: Liquorix Kernels
« Reply #4 on: 2011/12/23, 15:15:26 »
And yes cryptoserve:
linux "3.1-6.towo.1-siduction-amd64" works perfectly here!
... using systemd inspite of default insserv as init.
Logged
experiencing siduction runs better than my gentoo makes me know I know nothing

Offline DeepDayze

  • User
  • Posts: 457
Re: Liquorix Kernels
« Reply #5 on: 2011/12/23, 16:05:00 »
Quote from: "cryptosteve"
You guys are free to invite him ... and why not try alternative kernels with siduction?

But hey, towos siduction kernel is quite cool and works perfectly here ...


No not knocking towo's kernels just having choice is nice :)

@towo, not sure what license his kernels are under..but I'm sure he'd have no problem complying with the dfsg if it came down to that
Logged

Offline Lanzi

  • User
  • Posts: 1.777
Re: Liquorix Kernels
« Reply #6 on: 2011/12/23, 16:31:42 »
As I appreciate the contribution of highly gifted programmers and hackers somebody who knows him could invite him. I am sure he has more to contribute.
But licensematters, as mentiond my towo have to be kept in mind!
Logged

Offline DeepDayze

  • User
  • Posts: 457
Re: Liquorix Kernels
« Reply #7 on: 2011/12/24, 01:54:20 »
Quote from: "Lanzi"
As I appreciate the contribution of highly gifted programmers and hackers somebody who knows him could invite him. I am sure he has more to contribute.
But licensematters, as mentiond my towo have to be kept in mind!


I might ask him that question as to what license his kernels are under

Yes he's quite intelligent and even slh felt threatened by how smart he is
Logged

Offline piper

  • User
  • Posts: 1.785
  • we are the priests ... of the temples of syrinx
RE: Re: Liquorix Kernels
« Reply #8 on: 2011/12/24, 20:41:11 »
I might give it a whack also, I am now doing a android kernel
Logged
Free speech isn't just fucking saying what you want to say, it's also hearing what you don't want to fucking hear

I either give too many fucks or no fucks at all, it's like I cannot find a middle ground for a moderate fuck distribution, it's like what the fuck

tlmiller

  • Guest
RE: Re: Liquorix Kernels
« Reply #9 on: 2012/01/01, 03:08:40 »
I use the liquorix kernels on my installs that are built from stock Debian.  They are great kernels, but mostly I only use them because I track Debian testing, and except for a few months right after the release of a new stable, they tend to get their kernels long in the tooth.

I'm waiting for my USB to finish copying and then I'll be installing siduction on an old desktop I have around that I'm going to be selling off.

Will have to sometime try the 2 kernels maybe on some of my "problem" hardware on some of my laptops see if one or the other is actually superior.
Logged

nadir

  • Guest
Re: RE: Re: Liquorix Kernels
« Reply #10 on: 2012/01/11, 01:09:35 »
Quote from: "tlmiller"
I use the liquorix kernels on my installs that are built from stock Debian.  They are great kernels, but mostly I only use them because I track Debian testing, and except for a few months right after the release of a new stable, they tend to get their kernels long in the tooth.

I don't think so:
http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/linux-image-2.6-686
Logged

tlmiller

  • Guest
RE: Re: RE: Re: Liquorix Kernels
« Reply #11 on: 2012/01/11, 04:44:28 »
yes, right now it's still up to date.  But it will start slowing down with keeping up to date after they hit 3.2.
Logged

hinto

  • Guest
Re: Liquorix Kernels
« Reply #12 on: 2012/01/11, 05:23:47 »
Quote from: "cryptosteve"
You guys are free to invite him ... and why not try alternative kernels with siduction?

But hey, towos siduction kernel is quite cool and works perfectly here ...


I included siduction sources.list just to get towo's kernel.
So far, it seems to out perform the liquorix one, at least the way I use linux.  I have a linux host (core2 quad, 8gb ram) and run a Win7 vm guest, configured to use 4 cores and 6gb ram.

I don't see any pregnant pauses with towo's kernel (so far).

-Hinto
Logged

mylo

  • Guest
Re: RE: Liquorix Kernels
« Reply #13 on: 2012/01/11, 10:08:24 »
Quote from: "ralul"
...

... using systemd inspite of default insserv as init.


Hi ralul,

is your statement a recommendation for a change?
Or is it siduction standard from installation?
Because I migrated to siduction without a complete reinstall (I know that is better), I have insserv operational.

Makes it sense to change? Is it possible to change? And if yes how (just purge and install?)?

Code: [Select]
insserv:
  Installiert: 1.14.0-2.1
  Kandidat:    1.14.0-2.1
  Versionstabelle:
 *** 1.14.0-2.1 0
        500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
systemd:
  Installiert: (keine)
  Kandidat:    37-1
  Versionstabelle:
     37-1 0
        500 http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages
Logged

Offline devil

  • Administrator
  • User
  • *****
  • Posts: 4.842
Re: RE: Liquorix Kernels
« Reply #14 on: 2012/01/11, 10:37:35 »
Systemd at this moment is not for the faint at heart and would leave you mostly on your own. On a testbed: yes. productive? no way.

greetz
devil
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »