Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Author Topic: [EN] ATI Radeon HD4850 (again)  (Read 5108 times)

Offline tuxic

  • User
  • Posts: 117
[EN] ATI Radeon HD4850 (again)
« on: 2014/02/27, 11:51:42 »
I have dual ATI Radeon HD 4850. Please let me know if the "fix" to the fglrx-legacy-driver open a new door for my cards in terms of proprietary drivers...


Code: [Select]
oscar@solyd-sid:~$ apt-cache policy fglrx-legacy-driver
fglrx-legacy-driver:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 8.97.100.7-4+fix1
  Version table:
     8.97.100.7-4+fix1 0
        500 http://packages.siduction.org/fixes/ unstable/non-free amd64 Packages
     8.97.100.7-4 0
        500 http://http.debian.net/debian/ unstable/non-free amd64 Packages
     8.97.100.3+1-2 0
        100 http://packages.siduction.org/experimental/ unstable/non-free amd64 Packages
"Many people live and die..., and all they do is process groceries."
                  H. Peavey

Offline tuxic

  • User
  • Posts: 117
Re: ATI Radeon HD4850 (again)
« Reply #1 on: 2014/02/28, 09:59:10 »
No options available...


Code: [Select]
oscar@solyd-sid:~$ sudo apt-get install fglrx-legacy-driver
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:


The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 fglrx-legacy-driver : Depends: xorg-video-abi-14 but it is not installable or
                                xorg-video-abi-12 but it is not installable or
                                xorg-video-abi-11 but it is not installable or
                                xorg-video-abi-10 but it is not installable or
                                xorg-video-abi-8 but it is not installable or
                                xorg-video-abi-6.0 but it is not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
« Last Edit: 2014/02/28, 10:13:52 by tuxic »
"Many people live and die..., and all they do is process groceries."
                  H. Peavey

Offline towo

  • Administrator
  • User
  • *****
  • Posts: 2.939
Re: ATI Radeon HD4850 (again)
« Reply #2 on: 2014/02/28, 10:16:20 »
For a Radeon HD4xxx you don't need fglrx, radeon does work fine for this chipset.
Ich gehe nicht zum Karneval, ich verleihe nur manchmal mein Gesicht.

Offline tuxic

  • User
  • Posts: 117
Re: ATI Radeon HD4850 (again)
« Reply #3 on: 2014/02/28, 10:24:47 »
Towo wrote:

Quote
For a Radeon HD4xxx you don't need fglrx, radeon does work fine for this chipset.


Is it possible to use the Crossfire advantages with the free xorg-radeon?
"Many people live and die..., and all they do is process groceries."
                  H. Peavey

Smon

  • Guest
Re: ATI Radeon HD4850 (again)
« Reply #4 on: 2014/03/04, 15:19:15 »
No, it is not possible

timc

  • Guest
Re: ATI Radeon HD4850 (again)
« Reply #5 on: 2014/03/04, 16:25:40 »
@tuxic - Arch Linux maintains a "legacy" version of the Catalyst driver for the older chipsets. I do not know how (or even if) Debian manages this.

Tim

PS - I did some Debian package searches. I see several packages in unstable with names containing fglrx and legacy. As I have never used them, I don't know anything else I can say about them.
« Last Edit: 2014/03/04, 16:29:06 by timc »

Smon

  • Guest
Re: ATI Radeon HD4850 (again)
« Reply #6 on: 2014/03/04, 17:03:48 »
No, Arch Linux does NOT maintain such a package. There are several packages in the AUR, but the AUR is not Arch.

timc

  • Guest
Re: ATI Radeon HD4850 (again)
« Reply #7 on: 2014/03/04, 22:07:50 »
No, Arch Linux does NOT maintain such a package. There are several packages in the AUR, but the AUR is not Arch.

Hmmm... They used to. It's been over a year since I used Arch, much.

Anyway, we are talking about Debian, here.

Tim

Smon

  • Guest
Re: ATI Radeon HD4850 (again)
« Reply #8 on: 2014/03/04, 22:53:09 »
I am to lazy to scroll up, but i am pretty sure, you came up with that topic :p