Siduction Forum
Siduction Forum => Software - Support => Topic started by: mylo on 2012/06/19, 20:10:32
-
Hallo,
wine ist seit längerer Zeit bei mir auf "hold".
Wo kann man erfahren, was da los ist und wie/wann es weitergeht?
-
apt-mark showhold
greetz
devil
-
Take a look in this thread (http://forum.siduction.org/index.php?topic=2443)
By the way: You are in the wrong forum or using the wrong language.
-
sorry for that
-
apt-mark showhold
greetz
devil
shows nothing here, however
hängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut.
Statusinformationen werden eingelesen.... Fertig
Paketaktualisierung (Upgrade) wird berechnet... Fertig
Die folgenden Pakete sind zurückgehalten worden:
wine
0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 1 nicht aktualisiert.
Is that a contradiction? Is it just my box concerned?
-
apt-mark showhold
shows holds by user interaction. It does not show holds by maintainers.
But it is strange. When I do (on a 64 bit installation):
apt-get install wine -s
I get the following output:
# apt-get install wine -s
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut.
Statusinformationen werden eingelesen.... Fertig
Die folgenden zusätzlichen Pakete werden installiert:
wine64-bin
Die folgenden Pakete werden ENTFERNT:
lmms wine-bin
Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden installiert:
wine wine64-bin
0 aktualisiert, 2 neu installiert, 2 zu entfernen und 0 nicht aktualisiert.
Remv lmms [0.4.10-2.2]
Remv wine-bin [1.2.3-0.3]
Inst wine64-bin (1.4.1-1 Debian:unstable [amd64])
Inst wine (1.4.1-1 Debian:unstable [amd64])
Conf wine64-bin (1.4.1-1 Debian:unstable [amd64])
Conf wine (1.4.1-1 Debian:unstable [amd64])
Nothing on hold. Try to purge your old win installation (1.2.x) and install wine again.
I have no clue what prevents wine from being upgraded on your system.
Did you "apt-get update" before?
-
It's not a good idea to upgrade wine these days, cause:
This is the wine64-bin helper package, which does not provide wine itself,
but instead exists solely to provide the following information about
enabling multiarch on your system in order to be able to install and run
the 32-bit wine packages.
The following commands should be issued as root or via sudo in order to
enable multiarch (the last command installs 32-bit wine):
# dpkg --add-architecture i386
# sed -i 's/deb\ /deb\ [arch=amd64,i386]\ /g' /etc/apt/sources.list
# apt-get update
# apt-get install wine-bin:i386
Be very careful as spaces matter above. For kfreebsd systems, replace i386
and amd64 with kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64. Note that this package
(wine64-bin) will be removed in the process. For more information on the
multiarch conversion, see:
http://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/HOWTO
and
[root@shangrila:~]# LANG=C apt-get install wine-bin:i386
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
wine-bin:i386 : Depends: libwine-bin:i386 (= 1.4.1-1) but it is not going to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
Edit: Hmm, maybe I'm to stupid?! :) What are these held packages? Nothing at showhold, removed all old *wine* packages.
-
@cryptosteve
where do you have defined your debian mirror, in /etc/apt/sources.list or in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list?
Maybe
# sed -i 's/deb\ /deb\ [arch=amd64,i386]\ /g' /etc/apt/sources.list
does not cover your variation properly?
-
Good one, michaa7. I fixed that but I get the same error.
[root@shangrila:~][root@shangrila:~]# dpkg -l | grep wine
ii libkwineffects1abi3
# LANG=C apt-get install wine-bin:i386
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
wine-bin:i386 : Depends: libwine-bin:i386 (= 1.4.1-1) but it is not going to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
-
What happens if you try "apt-get install wine-bin:i386 libwine-bin:i386"?
-
Strange stuff :)
[root@shangrila:~]# LANG=C apt-get install wine-bin:i386 libwine-bin:i386
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libwine-bin:i386 : Depends: libwine:i386 (= 1.4.1-1) but it is not going to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
-
Ok, then try "apt-get install wine-bin:i386 libwine-bin:i386 libwine:i386" you see what's to do if there are more unsolved dependencies? I think it only will work if all packages from wine in i386 are installed.
-
Hmm ... other output but still strange
[root@shangrila:~]# LANG=C apt-get install wine-bin:i386 libwine-bin:i386 libwine:i386
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libwine:i386 : Depends: libfreetype6:i386 (>= 2.2.1) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libpng12-0:i386 (>= 1.2.13-4) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libssl1.0.0:i386 (>= 1.0.0) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libxml2:i386 (>= 2.7.4) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: zlib1g:i386 (>= 1:1.1.4) but it is not going to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
-
Well,
another apt-get update at 20:35 this evening fixed this problem. With the following dist-upgrade I installed
[root@shangrila:~]# apt-get dist-upgrade
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut.
Statusinformationen werden eingelesen.... Fertig
Paketaktualisierung (Upgrade) wird berechnet... Fertig
Die folgenden Pakete werden aktualisiert (Upgrade):
kcalc kcharselect lib32z1 libxvidcore4 php5-cgi php5-common zlib1g
7 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht aktualisiert.
Now I can reinstall wine
[root@shangrila:~]# LANG=C apt-get install wine-bin:i386 libwine-bin:i386 libwine:i386
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
libfreetype6:i386 libpng12-0:i386 libssl1.0.0:i386 libwine-gecko-1.4 libxml2:i386 zlib1g:i386
Suggested packages:
wine-doc:i386 libwine-cms:i386 libwine-sane:i386 libwine-ldap:i386 libwine-print:i386 libwine-openal:i386 libwine-gphoto2:i386
Recommended packages:
libgsm1:i386 ttf-liberation:i386 libwine-gl:i386 libwine-alsa:i386 libwine-oss:i386 xml-core:i386
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libfreetype6:i386 libpng12-0:i386 libssl1.0.0:i386 libwine:i386 libwine-bin:i386 libwine-gecko-1.4 libxml2:i386 wine-bin:i386 zlib1g:i386
0 upgraded, 9 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 91.1 kB/54.4 MB of archives.
After this operation, 139 MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
-
What happens if you try "apt-get install wine-bin:i386 libwine-bin:i386"?
Hi Geier0815,
did you ask me? cryptosteve did hijack my thread.
-
...
Did you "apt-get update" before?
Sure michaa7,
I get
ins wine -s
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut.
Statusinformationen werden eingelesen.... Fertig
Die folgenden Pakete wurden automatisch installiert und werden nicht mehr benötigt:
libwine libwine-alsa libwine-bin libwine-cms libwine-gecko-unstable libwine-gl libwine-gphoto2 libwine-ldap
libwine-openal libwine-print libwine-sane
Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
Die folgenden zusätzlichen Pakete werden installiert:
wine64-bin
Die folgenden Pakete werden ENTFERNT:
wine-bin
Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden installiert:
wine64-bin
Die folgenden Pakete werden aktualisiert (Upgrade):
wine
1 aktualisiert, 1 neu installiert, 1 zu entfernen und 35 nicht aktualisiert.
Inst wine [1.2.3-0.3] (1.4.1-1 Debian:unstable [amd64]) []
Remv wine-bin [1.2.3-0.3] []
Inst wine64-bin (1.4.1-1 Debian:unstable [amd64])
Conf wine64-bin (1.4.1-1 Debian:unstable [amd64])
Conf wine (1.4.1-1 Debian:unstable [amd64])
I did apt-get autoremove, but this seems not working properly,as the recommendation shows up again.
-
...
Did you "apt-get update" before?
Hi michaa7,
sure, I get
ins wine -s
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut.
Statusinformationen werden eingelesen.... Fertig
Die folgenden Pakete wurden automatisch installiert und werden nicht mehr benötigt:
libwine libwine-alsa libwine-bin libwine-cms libwine-gecko-unstable libwine-gl libwine-gphoto2 libwine-ldap
libwine-openal libwine-print libwine-sane
Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
Die folgenden zusätzlichen Pakete werden installiert:
wine64-bin
Die folgenden Pakete werden ENTFERNT:
wine-bin
Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden installiert:
wine64-bin
Die folgenden Pakete werden aktualisiert (Upgrade):
wine
1 aktualisiert, 1 neu installiert, 1 zu entfernen und 35 nicht aktualisiert.
Inst wine [1.2.3-0.3] (1.4.1-1 Debian:unstable [amd64]) []
Remv wine-bin [1.2.3-0.3] []
Inst wine64-bin (1.4.1-1 Debian:unstable [amd64])
Conf wine64-bin (1.4.1-1 Debian:unstable [amd64])
Conf wine (1.4.1-1 Debian:unstable [amd64])
apt-get autoremove has been done before, but it seems it did its job not properly...
-
sorry for doubling, could not see first answer before...
-
I don't think this thread was hijacked, it seem CS found the solution
-
Sorry mylo, yes, I highjacked this a bit.
Next time I'll open a single thread for this - first I thought this was an similar problem.
-
cryptosteve, no problem.
However I do not understand whether this solution is for me also...
-
What's your problem? wine-bin will be de-installed, wine64-bin will go to be installed. What wine64-bin is, was descriebed by cryptosteve in this thread...
It seems to me that it could be better if you post your questions in the german section of the forum.
-
Thanks Geier0815,
english language is not my prob, I was rated 5 in english at the end of class 10, although this was a teacher related problem only. But that forced me to focuse on french. So today i am more or less trilingual.
Back to...I have to carefully read the thread and undertsand, you say everything is there, I believe.
In case I am back soon...
-
Wine is a mess at the moment (due to multi-arch?). Here are some bug from the last two weeks, but I didnt look into it:
http://bugs.debian.org/677996
wine [wine] Looks for Libs in /usr/local/lib/wine
http://bugs.debian.org/678388
wine64-bin upgrade of wine fails and then wine64-bin's instructions do not work
http://bugs.debian.org/676246
wine kernel32.dll.so has wrong VMA when built with -g
http://bugs.debian.org/677997
wine [wine] JAMMER Pro6 fails (used to run fine)
http://bugs.debian.org/678431
libwine-alsa-unstable empty/unusable on kfreebsd-i386
http://bugs.debian.org/677416
wine-bin-unstable uninstallable (missing Conflicts?)
http://bugs.debian.org/677201
libwine-unstable : arch-dependent files in Multi-Arch: same package
-
But you mix up things, those *wine-*-unstable packages are a different collection/version of wine packages. ***Both*** part of Debian Sid/Unstable.
-
Excuse for that, i didn't look into it.
Sometimes there are easy workarounds in bugs!
Someone of you should look it up!
-
:?:
-
@debianeux
welcome to siduction ...
... which is *not* based on testing/stable but unstable