Siduction Forum

Siduction Forum => Upgrade Warnings => Topic started by: melmarker on 2015/06/27, 23:06:05

Title: New lightdm in sid
Post by: melmarker on 2015/06/27, 23:06:05
Hi, there is a new lightdm in sid - so, if apt asks - the best choice is 'N'
Title: Re: New lightdm in sid
Post by: mylo on 2015/06/28, 14:05:59
pol lightdm
lightdm:
  Installiert:           1.14.0-1
  Installationskandidat: 1.14.0-1

Is it already the new one?
Title: Re: New lightdm in sid
Post by: melmarker on 2015/06/28, 14:39:24
nope

apt-cache policy lightdm
lightdm:
  Installiert:           1.14.2-1
  Installationskandidat: 1.14.2-1
  Versionstabelle:
*** 1.14.2-1 0
        990 http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages
        500 http://incoming.debian.org/debian-buildd/ buildd-unstable/main amd64 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     1.14.0-1 0
        500 http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing/main amd64 Packages
Title: Re: New lightdm in sid
Post by: mylo on 2015/06/29, 23:22:45
yep, that version arrived in between.
Title: Re: New lightdm in sid
Post by: KrunchTime on 2015/07/20, 09:17:50
Quote from: melmarker on 2015/06/27, 23:06:05
Hi, there is a new lightdm in sid - so, if apt asks - the best choice is 'N'
Is this still an issue and if so, why do you suggest choosing not to upgrade the package?
Title: Re: New lightdm in sid
Post by: melmarker on 2015/07/20, 09:37:41
@KrunchTime - this was for the debconf message - don't use the settings from the maintainer (=debian)
Title: Re: New lightdm in sid
Post by: KrunchTime on 2015/07/20, 09:40:24
Thank you, melmarker.
Title: Re: New lightdm in sid
Post by: holgerw on 2015/07/20, 15:22:57
Hello Alf,

so we've following situations during a dist-upgrade, when aswering questions refering to package settings:
1. package A comes from siduction repo, is a modified debian package and package A-new comes from debian repo
2. package A comes from siduction repo, is a modified debian package and package A-new also comes from siduction repo
3. package A comes from debian repo and A-new comes from siduction repo (perhaps a fix of broken stuff)
4. package A comes from debian repo and A-new also comes from debian repo
5. package A is a special siduction tool like ceni and A-new also comes from siduction

I guess, 1 is a candidate for answering no for holding siduction settings, 2,3,5 are candidates for yes, and 4 is a candidate for reading DU warnings carefully before answering :)

Am I right here?

Kind regards,
  Holger
Title: Re: New lightdm in sid
Post by: piper on 2015/07/20, 16:47:03
Always go with "N"  = everything

Unless something is posted here in the forums, is probably the best, safest way to go.

It's always been that way in sid as far as I can remember.
Title: Re: New lightdm in sid
Post by: melmarker on 2015/07/20, 20:02:27
@piper and holgerw - one could press D for diff - and descide if the proposed changes make sense
Title: Re: New lightdm in sid
Post by: piper on 2015/07/21, 00:44:55
I have just dedicated sddm as default for now, been running smooth, so I''l keep it. ;)
Title: Re: New lightdm in sid
Post by: melmarker on 2015/07/21, 20:56:31
@piper: you are a native speaker and use no such things like alternative keyboard layouts or fucking umlauts in your usernames and passwords? Ok, in that case is sddm a good choice :D

Edit: Looking into the sddm bugtracker and sources it might be that some of the things that i hate in sddm will be addressed within the next sddm release.
Title: Re: New lightdm in sid
Post by: piper on 2015/07/21, 23:36:51
@melmarker: i suppose i keep forgetting about the native shit, but yeah, fucking umlauts would piss me off too ;)