For some days I have been playing with apt and apt-get -- I have been comparing the performance of
apt-get dist-upgrade
and
apt full-upgrade
Today there was a condition on one of my systems where there was a new package to be installed, a package removal, and multiple upgraded packages. Comparing the two methods, I got identical results. This suggests to me that I can safely move to apt for upgrading my siduction systems. Does anyone have information to the contrary?
Thanks.
it's basicly the same - only nuances differ - there is no bash-completion for apt right now and there are some switches on by default - so on can assume roughly the same behaviour.
apt upgrade = apt-get upgrade --with-new-pkgs
apt dist-upgrade = apt-get dist-upgrade
both apt with some fancy stuff
Quote from: melmarkerit's basicly the same - only nuances differ - there is no bash-completion for apt right now...
quick'n'dirty solution:
cp /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/apt-get /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/aptIn file /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/apt replace 2x
apt-get and 2x
apt_get with
apt.
Ciao, Martin
Hi,
and if you like you can add the string "full-upgrade" to the file apt from my posting above. (You'll see where...)
Ciao, Martin
Apt 1.2, bound to hit Unstable tomorrow, has completion for apt. Also, using apt will from here on remove debs from /var/cache/apt/archives after the install is done (can be overriden). apt-get will keep debs, as it did up to now.
greetz
devil