seduction
 Language:
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
2019/12/06, 21:20:18


Help

Author [EN] [PL] [ES] [PT] [IT] [DE] [FR] [NL] [TR] [SR] [AR] [RU] Topic: bluez-obexd is being held back. Is that ok?  (Read 2148 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline vayu

  • User
  • Posts: 200
bluez-obexd is being held back. Is that ok?
« on: 2015/01/11, 04:35:28 »
I use bluetooth sometimes but am not dependent on it now.  I'm more concerned about my libraries not having conflicts in later upgrades. Does anyone know about bluez?

Offline musca

  • Global Moderator
  • User
  • *****
  • Posts: 725
  • sid, fly high!
Re: bluez-obexd is being held back. Is that ok?
« Reply #1 on: 2015/01/12, 11:15:46 »
hello vayu,

i'm not sure if bluez-obexd is still needed. It's not part of the default bluetooth functions. This was the software that is independent as obexd, but this has been integrated into BlueZ from BlueZ 5.0.

The installationcandidate depends on libical1a which recently has replaced libical1.
see this thread du will remove KDE apps.

I wonder why your stuff isn't removed. Which command did you use to upgrade your system?

greetings
musca
« Last Edit: 2015/01/13, 09:10:27 by musca »
„Es irrt der Mensch, solang er strebt.“  (Goethe, Faust)

Offline vayu

  • User
  • Posts: 200
Re: bluez-obexd is being held back. Is that ok?
« Reply #2 on: 2015/01/12, 11:44:23 »

I wonder why your stuff isn't removed. Which command did you use to upgrade your system?


Thanks.  It's the only package held back in a regular du.

Offline musca

  • Global Moderator
  • User
  • *****
  • Posts: 725
  • sid, fly high!
Re: bluez-obexd is being held back. Is that ok?
« Reply #3 on: 2015/01/12, 13:10:42 »
Code: [Select]
apt-cache policy libical1 libical1a
„Es irrt der Mensch, solang er strebt.“  (Goethe, Faust)

Offline vayu

  • User
  • Posts: 200
Re: bluez-obexd is being held back. Is that ok?
« Reply #4 on: 2015/01/12, 16:47:15 »
Code: [Select]
$ apt-cache policy libical1 libical1a
libical1:
  Installed: 1.0-1.2
  Candidate: 1.0-1.2
  Version table:
 *** 1.0-1.2 0
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
libical1a:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 1.0-1.3
  Version table:
     1.0-1.3 0
        500 http://http.debian.net/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages

Offline musca

  • Global Moderator
  • User
  • *****
  • Posts: 725
  • sid, fly high!
Re: bluez-obexd is being held back. Is that ok?
« Reply #5 on: 2015/01/13, 09:03:30 »

So it's confirmed.
„Es irrt der Mensch, solang er strebt.“  (Goethe, Faust)

Offline vayu

  • User
  • Posts: 200
Re: bluez-obexd is being held back. Is that ok?
« Reply #6 on: 2015/01/13, 10:51:37 »
If I try to install libical1a or if I try to remove libical1 it wants to remove 77 KDE packages? Will this just resolve or do I have to do something?

Offline der_bud

  • User
  • Posts: 896
  • member
Re: bluez-obexd is being held back. Is that ok?
« Reply #7 on: 2015/01/13, 11:20:38 »
This got solved here and for others with a simple dist-upgrade, which removed libical1, newly installed libical1a and updated the rest. If this does not work for you, please paste the complete output of 'apt-get dist-upgrade' (of course after apt-get update ;) ).
Du lachst? Wieso lachst du? Das ist doch oft so, Leute lachen erst und dann sind sie tot.

Offline spacepenguin

  • User
  • Posts: 863
    • spacepenguin.de
Re: bluez-obexd is being held back. Is that ok?
« Reply #8 on: 2015/01/18, 17:00:38 »
bluez-obexd is not installed on my system, libical1 is. And a d-u does not want to remove it although it doesn't seem to be in any repository. If I would try to install libical1a manually it would remove half of kde, but a d-u does not harm (kde-next is enabled). It's "just" that my system depends on an outdated package which it doesn't seem to know  :o.
Susan | Hardware: SysProfile
Music-Profile: http://www.last.fm/de/user/spacepengu