wbar-config in rc2 but not in repos?

[vilde]

I just red that rc-2 is coming with wbar-config. I am using rc-i and would like to install wbar-config but it's not in the repos?

[ReinerS]

Should be in there, I see wbar-config 2.3.4-siduction.3 in the repo/list.
Maybe the list of repos for siduction on your system is not complete yet ?

regards

Reiner

[vilde]

It's not there.

My repos but they are in different files

Code Select Expand

deb ftp://ftp.spline.de/pub/siduction/base unstable main
deb-src ftp://ftp.spline.de/pub/siduction/base unstable main

deb http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib
#deb-src http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib

deb ftp://ftp.spline.de/pub/siduction/extra unstable main
deb-src ftp://ftp.spline.de/pub/siduction/extra unstable main

deb ftp://ftp.spline.de/pub/siduction/fixes unstable main
deb-src ftp://ftp.spline.de/pub/siduction/fixes unstable main

deb http://packages.siduction.org/xfcenext unstable main
#deb-src http://packages.siduction.org/xfcenext unstable main

And, yes I did a d-u yesterday as devil suggested for rc1-users. (did another d-u today also)

[der_bud]

vilde, as far as I can see wbar-config is in the experimental repo, so one more line for your lists  :wink:

[vilde]

Thanks, got it in my repo now but it will not install

Code Select Expand

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
wbar-config : Depends: wbar (= 2.3.4~siduction.3) but 1.3.3+dfsg2-1 is to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.


[agaida]

vilde, it was intentional that we don't put the new wbar packages into extra before the release. The package we use in RC1 has a 7 year old base and isn't configuration-compatible to the new one. I will move wbar 2.4.3 to extra today or tomorrow.

[vilde]

Thank you agaida, then I know why and I will install when it's there