[solved] don't d-u until further notice

Started by michaa7, 2013/12/05, 20:30:00

Previous topic - Next topic

michaa7

#30
Thanks devil,


as here the cups transition seems completed daptup doesn't show anything related. But I wonder what to think about that bunch of outdated (veraltete) packages:
QuoteVeraltete Pakete:
  avahi-daemon: 0.6.31-2 -> 0.6.31-3, 277 Tage
  avahi-utils: 0.6.31-2 -> 0.6.31-3, 277 Tage
  exiftran: 2.07-10 -> 2.07-10+b1, 641 Tage
  foomatic-db-engine: 4.0.9-2 -> 4.0.9-3, 205 Tage
  gthumb: 3:3.0.1-2 -> 3:3.2.5-1, 538 Tage
  gthumb-data: 3:3.0.1-2 -> 3:3.2.5-1, 538 Tage
  libavahi-client-dev: 0.6.31-2 -> 0.6.31-3, 277 Tage
  libavahi-client3: 0.6.31-2 -> 0.6.31-3, 277 Tage
  libavahi-common-data: 0.6.31-2 -> 0.6.31-3, 277 Tage
  libavahi-common-dev: 0.6.31-2 -> 0.6.31-3, 277 Tage
  libavahi-common3: 0.6.31-2 -> 0.6.31-3, 277 Tage
  libavahi-core7: 0.6.31-2 -> 0.6.31-3, 277 Tage
  libavahi-glib1: 0.6.31-2 -> 0.6.31-3, 277 Tage
  libcharls1: 1.0-2 -> 1.0-3, 606 Tage
  libgif-dev: 4.1.6-10 -> 4.1.6-11, 415 Tage
  libgif4: 4.1.6-10 -> 4.1.6-11, 415 Tage
  libqxt-core0: 0.6.1-7 -> 0.6.2-1, 445 Tage
  libqxt-gui0: 0.6.1-7 -> 0.6.2-1, 445 Tage
  libslang2: 2.2.4-15 -> 2.2.4-16, 526 Tage
  libxerces-c28: 2.8.0+deb1-3 -> 2.8.0+deb1-3+b1, 527 Tage
  libxerces-c3.1: 3.1.1-3 -> 3.1.1-3+b1, 527 Tage
  phonon-backend-vlc: 0.6.2-2 -> 0.7.0-1, 194 Tage
  vlc: 2.0.8-1+b2 -> 2.1.1-1, 129 Tage
  vlc-nox: 2.0.8-1+b2 -> 2.1.1-1, 129 Tage
  vlc-plugin-notify: 2.0.8-1+b2 -> 2.1.1-1, 129 Tage


@dibl
why don't you try one of the updated us-mirrors I posted?
Ok, you can't code, but you still might be able to write a bug report for Debian's sake

dibl

Thanks Micha.  As of this morning, after a d-u, printing is working as expected.  I confirmed I have the cups-filters, as well as hplip and the printer-driver-foo2zjs packages installed, and it's all good.  Thanks!
System76 Oryx Pro, Intel Core i7-11800H, ASRock B860 Pro-A, Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF, Nvidia GTX-1060, SSD 990 EVO Plus.

devil

michaa7,


I think this list should only appear in the first run od the tool.


greetz
devil

michaa7

Stupid me, I did let it run *before* really d-u-ing, so packages were d/l-ed but not installed.
OTOH, it didn't show anything related to cups-filter (what I would expect with the new packages not installed and which was the cause for all the discussion ). I wonder if it is necessary to put a package explicitly on the watch list? And how to do that (there is no "man duptup")?


Any hints?
Ok, you can't code, but you still might be able to write a bug report for Debian's sake

dibl

System76 Oryx Pro, Intel Core i7-11800H, ASRock B860 Pro-A, Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF, Nvidia GTX-1060, SSD 990 EVO Plus.

michaa7

Ok, you can't code, but you still might be able to write a bug report for Debian's sake

spacepenguin

#36
So apart from printer stuff like foomatic-filters (obviously ok), ghostscript-cups, hpijs-ppds two other packages were removed: libfm-gtk-bin and libnepomukcleaner4. What about those two?
Susan | Hardware: SysProfile
Music-Profile: http://www.last.fm/de/user/spacepengu

devil

libfm-gtk-bin can be installed after libfm-tools are manualy installed. libnepomukcleaner4 still wants to remove half the system, but the package is optional anyways.


greetz
devil




michaa7

Quote# apt-cache show libfm-gtk-bin
Package: libfm-gtk-bin
Source: libfm
...
Description: transitional package for libfm-tools
This is transitional package for libfm-tools, and can be safely removed
after the installation is complete.

typo @ devil ? installed = uninstalled?


And on 32 bit there is no libnepomukcleaner4:
Quote# apt-cache policy libnepomukcleaner4
N: Paket libnepomukcleaner4 kann nicht gefunden werden.
Ok, you can't code, but you still might be able to write a bug report for Debian's sake